The wounded bird narrative



This story, almost heartbreaking in its poignancy, could almost have slipped from the pages of Mary Oliver, one of Williams’s favourite poets – or, for that matter, from one of her own films, which are filled with such moments combining the elegiac and the everyday. (Tom Shone, Michelle Williams “Blue Valentine” interview, The Telegraph)

Is it me, or is there something somewhat creepy in the way that profiles of Michelle Williams fetishize her very famous loss? How they make her sound so delicate yet so strong, mentioning her love of poetry and her lovely young girl and her tenuous loveliness. Since these pieces have to follow certain lines - she had a child with another actor, he died, accidentally, he won an Oscar - they never seem to get beyond that narrative. Which in some ways may be good for her, I suppose, since her actual life could be far away from celebrity machinery.

Driving around Brooklyn today, Williams keeps seeing ‘these little ghosts of me and Ryan doing these things. It’s strange and it’s sad. I’m the one left holding the memories because I’m the one who’s in that place. Everyone else is gone.’ It is the first thing I learn about Williams: she is never more than a beat from elegy. (Tom Shone, ibid)

And in other ways, it leads towards whole Modern Love columns about how maybe some Brooklyn writer’s child could marry Matilda Ledger and he could hang out with Michelle Williams, Michelle Williams, the two words known as “Michelle Williams,” all the time.

Michelle Williams peered around the counter at us, and I smiled and told her I’d keep an eye on things while she placed her order. Matilda ran back and joined my son, the two of them pounding on the tabletop for several minutes until Michelle Williams sat down with her coffee.

In case you ever wondered, Michelle Williams — very nice. (Modern Love, “He Had Her Attention, and Then He Lost It,” Albert Stern)

Aiming at charming, I suppose, it just ended up as creepy namedropping and a violation of personal privacy. The ickiness set in because there was no way this article would’ve been written without the repetition of “Michelle Williams, Michelle Williams, Michelle Williams” as a near-koan. It is, perhaps, the ultimate example of how your persona can shift into two words that mean something to the majority of people - the sad wife in Brokeback Mountain, the Dawson’s Creek ingenue made good, a Brooklyn bohemian Mom bravely muddling through - without ever becoming a reflection of the real, the tangible, and the everyday.

As we settled onto the sofa in front of the fireplace on the second floor of the house she had shared with Heath in their happier days, I presented her with her gifts. A gasp escaped her as she saw the Howard Moss book. Her eyes had already begun to mist as she ran her finger down the Table of Contents through the myriad titles and allowed it to come to rest at one of Moss’ most beautiful poems, “The Pruned Tree.” She turned to its page. There was one tear. Then there were two. But that was all. She flicked them away. It was her smile that now registered such wonder. (The Daily Beast, “Michelle Williams on her new film Blue Valentine,” Kevin Sessums)

The Sad Jackie O photo negative of Michelle Williams that you get in interviews these days is boring. But the Michelle Williams at the fringes of these articles, well, she’s fascinating.

I’d love to read about her someday.

…the secret is in landing limp and breaking the fall with a foot or a hand. It’s a knack. I started so young that landing right is second nature with me. Several times I’d have been killed if I hadn’t been able to land like a cat. Imitators of our act don’t last long, because they can’t stand the treatment.
Buster Keaton tells you how to fall, 1914.

It is difficult enough to be injured or gravely ill. To add to this the burden of guilt over a supposed failure to have the right attitude toward one’s illness is unconscionable. Linking health to personal virtue and vice not only is bad science, it’s bad medicine.
— What did you think of Richard Sloan’s Times op-ed, “A Fighting Spirit Won’t Save Your Life?” The narrative of disease in American/Western culture is a strange thing. You see enough variations of cancer and it’s pretty obvious that cancer isn’t particularly discerning regarding who it affects, despite people’s hope. And the way that raw food diets and things are marketed towards the sick, how it makes money off hope, it’s rather nauseating. (While also, likely, being a good idea when it comes to lifestyle.) A topic that may be too complicated for this one op-ed.

Real Amazon Reviews

One star for Laura Lippman’s Baltimore Blues:

A Letdown for Rowers, January 11, 2010

By 

[redacted]

This review is from: Baltimore Blues: A Tess Monaghan Novel (Tess Monaghan Mysteries) (Hardcover)

I read about one novel per decade. I picked up this one, having heard that it has characters who are rowers. (I myself row.) I was astonished, however, to encounter on page 10 a passage in which two rowers are in singles and one reaches out to touch the other. This is simply impossible to do! In fact, because of the way the oars and riggers stick out, it is impossible for two boats, side by side, to be more than eight feet from each other, and even then, there would be danger of capsizing one or both boats in subsequently separating them. Conclusion: the author, who has made her main character a rower, knows next to nothing about rowing! She has thus violated the cardinal rule of Creative Writing 101: write what you know about. I stopped reading.

This won’t, I realize, be an issue for non-rowers, but rowers who seek a novel about rowing would be well advised to look elsewhere!

Don’t even get me started about having to watch Claire Danes age into a sinewy ballerina of a woman, her even skin and taut limbs offering no proof that she was ever a teenager at all. It’s like watching a dear friend—your sister, a twin—wear a diamond ring the size of a lighthouse, move to the suburbs, and vanish forever. I say this knowing that Claire Danes (the actress) is not the same as Angela Chase (the character), but memories are no more rational than dreams.
— “My Rayannes” by Emma Straub on the Paris Review website. Her book Other People We Married is coming out very soon - I had the chance to read an ARC of it and I loved it so much. Terrifically funny, with goofy laughter and sadness that was truly, truly reminiscent of Lorrie Moore.


Go read Another Bullshit Night in Suck City, one of my favorite books ever, I have all these FEELINGS about it - as a winter read, it is difficult, wrenching, and heartbreakingly beautiful - and then go read firstpersonsingular’s great interview with Nick Flynn on The Rumpus.

I’m really curious about what will happen with the imminent film version, set to star Paul Dano* (who has been too wussy in too many crappy indies like the terrible Gigantic and the awful The Extra Man, although he can go head to head with Great Actors, so we will see, and I wish it could be an Andrew Garfield, or probably some young UK/Australian actor, since, frankly, they seem like men as opposed to Jesse Eisenberg/Dano/or that Canadian wimp Michael Cera) and Robert DeNiro. Having watched The Wire Season 5 this weekend, I’d be interested in what a David Simon would do with the source material, but Paul Weitz is doing it. We will see! I wonder where it’s going to be filmed; in particular, the Boston in the book is not the Boston of today, I find. But get out of the greater Boston area and there are so many dilapidated mill towns with empty, falling down buildings that could be a fair approximation.

(I haven’t seen this cover of the book and I love it. UK version, maybe? It is so much better than the US cover, which looks like bad 70s art. The cover for his new book of poetry is so creepy and gorgeous, and I first encountered that photo on a Shearwater album about birds. Because every Shearwater album is about birds.)

*Dano is a total upgrade from Casey Affleck, who - ever since I’m Still Here - I feel visceral hate towards, even if there’s just a photo of him in a magazine.

Source: http://firstpersonsingular.tumblr.com/post...

Michael Fassbender hates shirts


Exhibit A: Fish Tank (2009)



Exhibit B: 300 (2006)



Exhibit C: Hunger (2008)



Exhibit D: Centurion (2010)



Is it written in his contract? Why did Tarantino make him wear a shirt in Inglourious Basterds, thus, TAMING the Fassbender charm? The secret Fassbender weapon? His next film’s going to be Jane Eyre (obviously, Mr. Rochester’s manliness and animalistic sexual charm is linked to a desire to go topless) and then Shame, which is a film about a SEX ADDICT. How many sex addicts wear shirts?

Conclusion: Michael Fassbender’s career is a concerted attempt in playing roles where he doesn’t have to wear a shirt. Want him in your movie? Cast him as “the guy with no shirt.” Because that chest has to run free: